Twitter
    Sportspress Northwest
    • Football
    • Baseball
    • NCAA
    • Hockey
    • Soccer
    • Basketball
    Twitter
    Sportspress Northwest
    Twitter
    Home » Thiel: Seahawks take Cowboys to the shed, 27-7
    King5

    Thiel: Seahawks take Cowboys to the shed, 27-7

    Art ThielBy Art ThielSeptember 16, 2012Updated:October 4, 201232 Comments5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn Email
    Safety Jeron Johnson exults after he scooped up a blocked punt for a touchdown Sunday in Seattle's victory over the Cowboys. / Drew McKenzie, Sportspress Northwest

    The nickname for the Seahawks secondary is “Legion of Boom.” An honorary membership is hereby extended to wide receiver Golden Tate.

    Remarkable as was the 27-7 outcome over the Dallas Cowboys Sunday at the Clink, the way it was administered was breathtaking — an application of Northwest wood in the harshest way. None was more harsh than what was delivered by Tate to Cowboys linebacker Sean Lee, who was jacked so high there was concern that Lee might suffer burns upon re-entry into the earth’s atmosphere.

    Fortunately, Lee was merely knocked woozy, and returned to the game. Same could not be said of the Cowboys.

    Tate’s blow came in the fourth quarter as quarterback Russell Wilson made it clear he was changing the play from pass to run like hell. Tate doubled back to help block the scramble. Lee, bearing down on Wilson, didn’t see who was bearing down on him. Boom. Join the Legion.

    In a day of memorable plays for Seattle, the decleating of Lee is offered as the best  impression of the Seahawks’ largest virtue — weapons-grade ferocity. Tate’s play will undoubtedly be reviewed by the NFL, and few would be surprised if Tate was punished with a stiff fine for hitting a defenseless player. But the replacement officials called nothing, instead throwing a flag against the Cowboys on the same play for a light tap on Wilson going out of bounds.

    In spite of the magnum screw-up by the refs, the shot was symbolic of a power game unleashed upon the Cowboys.

    “Now I see why (Seahawks defensive back Kam Chancellor) likes defense,” said Tate. “I hope (Lee) is OK. Man, it felt great — better than a touchdown to me.

    These (defensive players) are always trying to take our heads off. Who says an offensive player can’t do the same?”

    As much as the dent Tate put in Lee spoke for itself, the representative play was obvious all the way to the opposing coach.

    “Obviously, you want to be more physical — you want to physically dominate them,” head coach Jason Garrett said. “In this game, we certainly didn’t do that.”

    More than yards and points, it was the power the Seahawks exerted over the Cowboys that was startling. Remember the long-held national reputation of the Seahawks as a soft team? These guys have a suggestion where the critics can install the Charmin.

    “For us to finish the second half so aggressively and so tough, I’m really proud of it,” said coach Pete Carroll. “I think it was really cool to be to be doing in front of the 12th Man — they were on it today.”

    Touchdown drives of 88 and 90 yards did much to stimulate the passions, as did holding the Cowboys in the second half to three first downs and 34 yards of offense. Then there was the special teams, which had a decisive edge as they did in the opener at Arizona.

    The kick rush unit was primarily responsible for a 10-0 lead in the game’s first five minutes. On the opening kickoff, RB Michael Robinson tore loose the ball from returner Felix Jones, which was recovered by FS Earl Thomas. After the Seahawks made a field goal out of it, the defense forced a three-and-out on the Cowboys’ first scrimmage possession.

    On Chris Jones’ punt, LB Malcolm Smith clobbered the ball and sent it flying backward. SS Jeron Johnson scooped it up at the 3-yard line, and suddenly it was 10-0.

    The rest of the half was a trudge for both teams, with Dallas getting its only touchdown early in the second quarter on a 22-yard pass from QB Tony Romo to WR Miles Austin. But in the third quarter, the Seahawks began grinding with the running game, despite not having LT Russell Okung (sore knee) and only part-time work from starting right guard John Moffitt and tight end Zach Miller.

    Midway through the period, Marshawn Lynch had a breakthrough, a 36-yard run in his finest Beast Quake form.

    “That was huge for us,” said Wilson. “Those runs where you’re getting two or three yards (early in the game) usually open up to 15 yard gains or more.”

    Wilson had what was nearly a perfect game from Carroll’s perspective: 15 completions in 20 attempts for 151 yards and no turnovers (passer rating 112.7), including a 22-yard pass for a TD to Anthony McCoy. That completed a 90-yard drive in eight plays, only two of which were passes.

    The next time they had the ball, the Seahawks went 88 yards in 12 plays over nearly eight minutes, a massive example of scrimmage control.

    “I don’t think I’ve ever been part of 88- and 90-yard drives back-to-back,” said center Max Unger. “We rotated through seven guys (through the O-line) and kept the communication going, which is something we didn’t do last week.”

    All the while, the defense was disrupting Romo’s timing while delivering licks on receivers that left the Cowboys wanting no more. TE Jason Witten, one of Dallas’s biggest weapons, was a ghost for most of the second half. The Cowboys had only 49 yards rushing, with a long gain of nine.

    What most pleased Carroll was the recovery from the 20-16 loss in Arizona, a game the Seahawks, and most Seahawks fans, believed should have been won.

    “Last week made us all go into this shock thing, like, ‘How did we not get that game?'” he said.  “Other than that, we’ve been on stride the whole time. We’re going to be very excited about coming back and playing next week.”

    That would be the Green Bay Packers on Monday Night Football Sept. 24. Tate and his pals already are laying in more harsh.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn Email

    Related Posts

    A few musings about sports journalism as the unwinding begins

    February 18, 2022

    Carroll’s staff makeover seeks to get Wilson back in the game

    February 16, 2022

    Arizona loss unmasks truths about Hopkins, UW hoops

    February 15, 2022

    32 Comments

    1. Humancockroach on September 16, 2012 10:41 pm

      Is there some rule I haven’t heard about regarding “defenseless” Linebackers on a running play?? If the NFL fines a wr for making a clean block on a linebacker than there is issues. I’ve seen this brought up multiple times, but have yet to here a rule protecting linebackers on a defensive running play. He wasn’t engaged, he wasn’t cut low, it wasn’t a turnover, it wasn’t against Any rule I have ever heard of, so WHY would he be fined for a legal play on a player that isn’t considered defenseless. Someone please clarify this??

      • skeletony on September 17, 2012 8:22 pm

         You see that from every team’s fans when they lose or get embarrassed. All of a sudden one of the blocks was an “illegal hit”. If the positions were reversed Dallas fans would be clowning us hardcore if we came to their forums and whined about that hit. But Dallas is a big market team so we will have to see if sanity prevails here or they take the safe route and fine Tate to keep whiners from rioting.

        • Artthiel on September 17, 2012 11:15 pm

           It’s fans’ privilege to look from their side. I don’t think the NFL will play politics on this.

    2. Humancockroach on September 16, 2012 9:41 pm

      Is there some rule I haven’t heard about regarding “defenseless” Linebackers on a running play?? If the NFL fines a wr for making a clean block on a linebacker than there is issues. I’ve seen this brought up multiple times, but have yet to here a rule protecting linebackers on a defensive running play. He wasn’t engaged, he wasn’t cut low, it wasn’t a turnover, it wasn’t against Any rule I have ever heard of, so WHY would he be fined for a legal play on a player that isn’t considered defenseless. Someone please clarify this??

      • skeletony on September 17, 2012 7:22 pm

         You see that from every team’s fans when they lose or get embarrassed. All of a sudden one of the blocks was an “illegal hit”. If the positions were reversed Dallas fans would be clowning us hardcore if we came to their forums and whined about that hit. But Dallas is a big market team so we will have to see if sanity prevails here or they take the safe route and fine Tate to keep whiners from rioting.

        • Artthiel on September 17, 2012 10:15 pm

           It’s fans’ privilege to look from their side. I don’t think the NFL will play politics on this.

    3. Pixeldawg13 on September 17, 2012 6:31 am

      @ Humancockroach (not a very self-complimentary handle, there.)
      As I see it, the reason Tate may get fined isn’t that Lee was ‘defenseless’–Tate was in front of him–but that Tate was leading with his helmet and hit Lee pretty much square in the face.  That does violate a league rule.

      But it was a delightfully wicked block.  

      • skeletony on September 17, 2012 8:18 pm

         Actually he hit him in the chest, not the head/face. Look at the replay more closely. The contact with the crown of Tate’s helmet occurs after Tate lays into Lee with that vicious hit.

      • Artthiel on September 17, 2012 11:10 pm

         Photos at impact show Tate hitting Lee’s chest, and below the helmet.

    4. Pixeldawg13 on September 17, 2012 5:31 am

      @ Humancockroach (not a very self-complimentary handle, there.)
      As I see it, the reason Tate may get fined isn’t that Lee was ‘defenseless’–Tate was in front of him–but that Tate was leading with his helmet and hit Lee pretty much square in the face.  That does violate a league rule.

      But it was a delightfully wicked block.  

      • skeletony on September 17, 2012 7:18 pm

         Actually he hit him in the chest, not the head/face. Look at the replay more closely. The contact with the crown of Tate’s helmet occurs after Tate lays into Lee with that vicious hit.

      • Artthiel on September 17, 2012 10:10 pm

         Photos at impact show Tate hitting Lee’s chest, and below the helmet.

    5. effzee on September 17, 2012 8:25 am

      I wonder if the defenseless player rule only applies to certain situations, like after a turnover or if the player is in the air or something? Yes, he didn’t see Tate, but he was running full speed after Wilson, going for the tackle, so I see it as a legit block. Tate even said afterwards that he tried to be seen by Lee before making contact but the dude just didn’t look at him.

      • Artthiel on September 17, 2012 11:08 pm

         Wasn’t blind side. It was an angle, but within reasonable view.

    6. effzee on September 17, 2012 7:25 am

      I wonder if the defenseless player rule only applies to certain situations, like after a turnover or if the player is in the air or something? Yes, he didn’t see Tate, but he was running full speed after Wilson, going for the tackle, so I see it as a legit block. Tate even said afterwards that he tried to be seen by Lee before making contact but the dude just didn’t look at him.

      • Artthiel on September 17, 2012 10:08 pm

         Wasn’t blind side. It was an angle, but within reasonable view.

    7. Humancockroach on September 17, 2012 8:27 am

      And yet every single dive, block or hit on the inside on running plays have the same contact on nearly every play. A FB makes that block on an off tackle run and there is no question about fines, how defenseless, or how he lead with his head… There is no ref or league that would fine them for making that block. IMHO it was clean, and the only person responsible for Lee getting lit up like that was Lee. He knew Tate was there ( as he was covering him). What was Tate supposed to do? Stand there and let Lee hit the QB? Using your helmet, pads or arms to block aren’t against the rules, a wr coming back and blocking isn’t against the rules, there isn’t even a rule against blocking against a defender by hitting him in the head, that rule simply doesn’t exist….. ( as for the name it’s a nickname I got when I was working excessive hours ” cockroaches and I can’t be killed” LOL)

      • Artthiel on September 17, 2012 11:07 pm

         Rule No. 1 upon entering the football field of play: Put your head on swivel.

    8. Humancockroach on September 17, 2012 7:27 am

      And yet every single dive, block or hit on the inside on running plays have the same contact on nearly every play. A FB makes that block on an off tackle run and there is no question about fines, how defenseless, or how he lead with his head… There is no ref or league that would fine them for making that block. IMHO it was clean, and the only person responsible for Lee getting lit up like that was Lee. He knew Tate was there ( as he was covering him). What was Tate supposed to do? Stand there and let Lee hit the QB? Using your helmet, pads or arms to block aren’t against the rules, a wr coming back and blocking isn’t against the rules, there isn’t even a rule against blocking against a defender by hitting him in the head, that rule simply doesn’t exist….. ( as for the name it’s a nickname I got when I was working excessive hours ” cockroaches and I can’t be killed” LOL)

      • Artthiel on September 17, 2012 10:07 pm

         Rule No. 1 upon entering the football field of play: Put your head on swivel.

    9. Bayviewherb on September 17, 2012 12:07 pm

      I waited for Sportscenter to talk about the game. They even had a feature about some of the rookie QB’s winning. Nary a word about the Seahawk-Coqboy game or our rookie QB.

      • Artthiel on September 17, 2012 11:05 pm

         You need to stay up later, after the World Series of Poker.

      • Jamo57 on September 18, 2012 8:38 am

        I said to my son the only time ESPN doesn’t spend a lot of time on the Cowboys is when they get drilled by the Seahawks.    Watching Chris Berman give a summary of the game on The Blitz was hilarious as you could tell he did not have the facts of the game right.   In fairness to Chris with the game being a West Coast afternoon affair, he was probably getting the details of the game for the first time and was probably summarizing in real time.   But it was short and wrong.

        Further fuel for us ‘east coast bias’ conspiracy theorists.   LOL.

    10. Bayviewherb on September 17, 2012 11:07 am

      I waited for Sportscenter to talk about the game. They even had a feature about some of the rookie QB’s winning. Nary a word about the Seahawk-Coqboy game or our rookie QB.

      • Artthiel on September 17, 2012 10:05 pm

         You need to stay up later, after the World Series of Poker.

      • Jamo57 on September 18, 2012 7:38 am

        I said to my son the only time ESPN doesn’t spend a lot of time on the Cowboys is when they get drilled by the Seahawks.    Watching Chris Berman give a summary of the game on The Blitz was hilarious as you could tell he did not have the facts of the game right.   In fairness to Chris with the game being a West Coast afternoon affair, he was probably getting the details of the game for the first time and was probably summarizing in real time.   But it was short and wrong.

        Further fuel for us ‘east coast bias’ conspiracy theorists.   LOL.

    11. jafabian on September 17, 2012 4:54 pm

      Can’t believe this was the same team that struggled against the Cardinals.  But then again, the Cards beat the Pats at home.  In fact, the entire NFC Worst won on Sunday!  Obviously, a sign of the apocalpyse!

      • Artthiel on September 17, 2012 11:04 pm

         Need to get a title done before the Mayan calendar hits the expiration date.

    12. jafabian on September 17, 2012 3:54 pm

      Can’t believe this was the same team that struggled against the Cardinals.  But then again, the Cards beat the Pats at home.  In fact, the entire NFC Worst won on Sunday!  Obviously, a sign of the apocalpyse!

      • Artthiel on September 17, 2012 10:04 pm

         Need to get a title done before the Mayan calendar hits the expiration date.

    • Follow @Art_Thiel on Twitter
    Use our affiliate link on Amazon

    Subscribe to Our Weekly Roundup

    Get the top stories sent to your inbox every Thursday.

    Art Thiel on KNKX 88.5FM

    Kirsten Kendrick's Q. & A. with Thiel can be heard every Friday during Morning Edition at 5:45am and 7:45am and again that same day on All Things Considered at 4:44pm. It also airs Saturday at 9:35am.

    Listen now!
    Latest Posts

    A few musings about sports journalism as the unwinding begins

    February 18, 2022

    Carroll’s staff makeover seeks to get Wilson back in the game

    February 16, 2022

    Arizona loss unmasks truths about Hopkins, UW hoops

    February 15, 2022

    Rams win a survivors contest called the Super Bowl

    February 14, 2022
    Twitter
    • Football
    • Baseball
    • NCAA
    • Hockey
    • Soccer
    • Basketball
    © 2025 Sportspress Northwest

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.